SEO since 2012. Ask me anything.

I'm Arthur, Head of Delivery at Local Digital in Sydney. Fifteen years of SEO, Google Ads and CRO, and a pretty good idea of what actually moves the needle. I write about the stuff that works.

  • Technical SEO, Google Ads and CRO, from painters to global ecommerce
  • I've broken plenty and fixed more, so you don't have to learn it the hard way
  • What works, what's a waste of money, and where AI actually fits
Arthur Fabik
Google AdsGoogle Analytics 4AhrefsScreaming FrogLooker StudioGoogle Tag ManagerClaude

Clients I've helped

eBayiiNetHarvey NormanKonica Minolta

Who's this bloke?

P.S. I'm not looking for clients

Arthur recording The SEO ShowArthur at the office with the teamArthur and Michael in the podcast studioArthur at Chiang Mai SEO Conference 2023Arthur at a Local Digital event

Quick rundown: I'm Arthur. I started my SEO journey in 2012, and in the years since I have seen some shit. I helped eBay claw their way back from a Google penalty in 2014. I've done time on gloriously boring B2B printer businesses. I've helped grow massive global ecommerce brands, and I've helped local painters get their phones ringing. Basically, you'd think I know my shit by now.

These days I run delivery at Local Digital, a Sydney agency, and this site is my sandbox. Built it from scratch with AI using Claude Code. I'm not a developer, and that's the point.

To be upfront: I'm not looking for clients. Believe me, I value my free time. But if you're after some sound SEO advice or want a second opinion on what an agency has told you, feel free to reach out.

There are so many dodgy operators in this industry. I would love to squash them all.

Read the blog

I also co-host an SEO podcast.

The SEO Show. Me and Michael Costin talking search, no fluff, new tips every episode. 100+ episodes and somehow people in 132 countries listen.

Rated 4.8/5 from 50+ reviews

Listen on

The SEO Show cover art
100+episodes on all things SEO
132countries the show is listened to

More about the show →

Hang on, didn't you say no clients?

I did, and I meant it. I don't have time to run end-to-end SEO campaigns properly, and I'm not interested in doing them half-arsed. But there's a difference between running your marketing and checking it. Audits I can do. If you're paying an agency and want to know if you're getting what you pay for, or want a straight answer before you sign with one, that's my lane.

Technical, content, authority, the lot. Not a 90-page PDF of screenshots from a tool. You get what's actually holding the site back, what to do about it, and in what order.

Where your budget is going and where it's being wasted. Wasted spend hides in plain sight: broad match creep, junk placements, bidding against yourself. I'll find it and show you.

What's helping, what's doing nothing, and what's flat-out dodgy. Especially worth it if a previous agency was buying links and never told you.

Whether ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Google's AI Overviews know your business exists, and what to change so they recommend you instead of your competitors.

About to sign with an agency? I'll read the proposal before you do the contract. I've written hundreds of these, I know where the padding goes and what the deliverables actually cost.

Not sure which one you need?

Tell me what's going on and I'll point you at the right one. No pitch, no lock-in.

Questions I get asked a lot

Since 2012, so we're talking well over a decade of watching Google move the goalposts. I've done technical SEO, Google Ads, CRO, the lot, across everything from massive global ecommerce brands to local painters. I helped eBay claw their way back from a Google penalty back in 2014, which tells you how long I've been at this. Long enough to have seen every "SEO is dead" cycle come and go, and long enough to know which trends actually matter and which are noise.

No. It gets declared dead roughly once a year, usually by someone selling you the thing that's meant to replace it. Search behaviour changes, the tactics change, the channel does not die. People are still typing questions into things and clicking results, more than ever actually, they're just doing it across more places now. If anything the fundamentals matter more than they used to, because there are more ways to get it wrong.

Maybe. I'm a marketer, not a philosopher, so I'm probably the wrong bloke to bet your life on. What I can tell you is it's already changed how I work day to day, this whole site was built with it, and the people panicking and the people ignoring it both seem equally wrong to me. Somewhere in the sensible middle is where the useful stuff lives. Ask me again in a couple of years.

Maybe, if by "search" you mean the ten blue links we all grew up with. That format is genuinely changing, and fast. But "search" as in people looking for answers and businesses wanting to be found? That's not going anywhere, it's just moving into new surfaces like AI overviews and chatbots. The job stops being "rank number one on Google" and becomes "be the answer wherever people are asking". Different game, same reason to play it.

Yes. Here's the simple version: it's still one of the only marketing channels where you're reaching people at the exact moment they want what you sell, and you're not renting the audience by the click forever. The channel is broadening, not shrinking. What's changed is you can't coast on old tactics anymore, the bar for actually being useful has gone up. Do it properly and it still compounds like nothing else. Do it lazily and yeah, you'll waste your money, but that was always true.

Yes, and don't get too hung up on the acronym, half of them will be renamed by the time you read this. Strip away the jargon and it's the same job it's always been: make sure the things people use to find businesses actually understand yours and recommend it. That used to be Google. Now it's also ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and the AI answers sitting on top of search. Getting mentioned there is absolutely worth it, because that's increasingly where the decision gets made. The good news is a lot of it rewards the same solid fundamentals as regular SEO, so it's not a whole new religion, it's an extension of the one you should already be practising.

Yes. It's a big part of what I look at now, whether that's auditing if the AI tools even know a business exists or working out why they're recommending a competitor instead. That said, remember I'm not chasing clients, my thing is audits and second opinions, not running your campaigns. So if you want to know whether you're actually visible in AI search, or whether the agency charging you for "AEO" is doing anything real, that's exactly my lane.